Affermative Action Essay -- Affirmative Action Essays

approbatory feat Affirmative Action efforts were started in 1964 to kibosh the long history ofoverlooking qualified people of color and women from higher education. AffirmativeAction sets standards for a business or office of admissions, so that a white man does nothave the upper-hand over an equally or greater educated minority. The initial way thegovernment tried to justify Affirmative Action was to develop a human resourceapproach first identifying the problem, which is racism then establishing the solution(Phillips 67). The intent of Affirmative Action helps cut galvanic pile discrimination in the work placeand in schools, despite the fact that some believe that affirmative action is a form ofreverse discrimination. In contrast, the first goal of Affirmative Action was to helppeople who were poor or badly educated, elevating them to positions for which they werenot objectively qualified (Buckley 95). Cousens, author of Public urbane Rights Agenciesand Fair Employment indic ates that the Affirmative Action techniques have theadvantage of not only persuading employers not to discriminate when hiring or accepting,but to expand employment and educational opportunities for minority groups (22). Therefore, Affirmative Action is legitimate because it does reduce discrimination in thework place and related areas such as University acceptance of college students. In theend, it should in no way be abolished.However, Affirmative action is highly controversial. Right now Proposition 209,in atomic number 20 which bans all programs involving race and sex preferences spring by the state,has passed but it will not be put into total action due to some questions of constitutionality (Ayres 34). The law will start slowly first, finis Affirmative Action inthe schools of California, leading up to the abolishment of Affirmative Action all together. An argument was declared by Mark Rosenbaum of the Southern CaliforniaBranch of the American genteel Liberties Union, Prop osition 209 should be declared unconstitutional because it singles out women and minorities and, at a timewhen discrimination still exists, seek to preclude them from attaining constitutionallyguaranteed right, like jobs and schooling. (Ayres 34). As R... ...Maybe the world hasnt exactly found equality as aresult, but with Affirmative Action, the world is a lot closer to equality than without it. Works CitedApplebome, Peter. Affirmative Action Ban Changes a Law School. New York Times2 July 1997 a14.Ayres, B. Drummond, Jr. Affirmative Action Battle Moves to Courts. New York Times 1 Dec. 1996 34.Benac, Nancy. Clinton Defends Preference Programs, Backs Reforms. Associated Press Writer. . 19 July, 1995.Buckley, William F., Jr. The Two Sides. National Review 14 Oct., 1996 95Cousens, Frances. Public Civil Rights Agencies and Fair Employment. New YorkPraeger, 1969.Hair, Penda D. Color Blind-or Just Blind? Nation 14 Oct. 1996 12.Once to Every Man. National Review 16 June, 1997 12.Phillips , D. Rhys. Equality in Employment. capital of Canada Canadian Gov., 1985 285Porter, Horace. Affirmative Action 1960s Dreams, 1990s Realities. Chronicle of Higher Education. 29 Nov. 1996 B6